Commendations and Recommendations for Technology Enabled Higher Education


This week, one of my media staff invited me in to demonstrate his work on virtual reality in higher education. He fitted me with the latest Oculus Rift headset and controllers. I went for a tour of the human body, travelling through the skin to the muscles, organs and bones. Then I visited an office, where I brought objects to virtual life by using a simulated 3D-printer. It was all very cool and exciting. It reminded me of my Stats Professor taking me to the computer lab and showing email to me and my peers. He said that email was going to revolutionise education. I could not see how, but I believed him. Once again, I cannot envision just how far virtual reality, and in combination with artificial intelligence, is going to take higher education. What I do know is that we are on the cusp of something exciting and I am optimistic about a whole new type of learning for my future grandchildren.

Across nearly 30 years, two countries and three universities, some of the roles I have held include postgraduate student, researcher, practicum coordinator, tutor, director and professor. In addition, national research grants have allowed me to visit most Australian universities. These experiences, over this timeframe, have led me to three groups of seven: conditions for a university to qualify as excellent; seven exemplar applications of education technology; and seven technology-related problems or challenges.

1. Graduate Success

These universities acknowledge that the primary reason most students go to university, is not for university itself, but for what comes after, and thereby sets students up for graduate success, including in careers.

2. Knowledge, Skills & Attributes

Learning is clearly defined and supported as positive change and development in a balance of knowledge (both discipline-specific and overall), skills (both technical and super-skills such as problem-solving) and attributes (meaning that a graduate has become someone more advanced and mature than if they had not gone to university).

3. Assessment & Feedback

Much of assessment, at these universities, is designed as learning opportunities whereby students are given rich and compelling assignments and specific, personalised feedback as well as iterative chances to adopt, adapt and improve.

4. Student Experience, Learning & Graduate Outcomes

The university embraces each student as a whole person and makes university-life about heightened opportunities for the overall student experience (including social), learning and graduate outcomes.

5. Passionate Staff

Staff (including but not limited to academics) are happy and passionate about supporting students, teaching, research, leadership and/or contributing to communities. Furthermore, these staff persons pass that enthusiasm on to students thereby creating healthy learning cultures.

6.Student Diversity

All students are respected, believed in, trusted and treated as diverse individuals with multiple life roles and responsibilities within and beyond the university.

7. Learning to Think

Students are invited, compelled and taught how to think, inquire, learn and to develop and portray their distinct identities and value propositions.

Just as there are these seven descriptors that characterise university excellence, there are also seven applications of technology that I have experienced as exemplar. This full set of technologies is not present at all (or most) universities, but large numbers of these technologies are applied at those universities who are striving to achieve some or most of the characteristics of excellence described above.

1. Micro-credentialing and Badging

Some universities have realised that pre-packaged degrees do not work for some students in some contexts, and as development for emerging careers. These universities use supporting technologies to manage, document and certify the offering of short modules. Students can complete these modules in a personalised sequence and timeframe that works for them. Students receive badges for each completed module. Completion of a specified number of badges qualifies students with a degree. Technology, in the form of online learning management systems, digital portfolios and databases, has enabled this personalisation and flexibility.

2. Program Mapping

While some disciplines and corresponding industries lend themselves to micro-credentialing (e.g. ever-shifting digital industries), others are better suited to fixed, sequential offering. This is the case for many degrees leading to membership in professional associations such as engineering and nursing. Technology has enabled careful mapping, benchmarking and refining of programs versus haphazard collections of courses (individual units of instruction which some universities call subjects). This allows careful learning plans that sequentially progress students through being introduced to knowledge, skills and attributes, which are further developed and then assured (certified) closer to graduation. Furthermore, assessment is carefully planned and managed in regard to type, sequence and content.

3. Data Analysis

Netflix makes choosing movies easy, because algorithms sort and classify choices onto your ‘personal picks’ based on characteristics of your watch history. Likewise, education uses data such as how long students spend on which online resources to create a profile and make predictions about future behaviours. Specifically, some universities now have clear predictors indicating which students are likely to succeed with the standard offerings and which are likely to need extra supports so that they don’t fail or drop-out. Armed with this data, sometimes all a student needs for a nudge back onto a success-path is a personal phone-call. Hearing the voice of a caring university staff person can be metaphorical chicken-soup for a student who previously felt like ‘only a number.’

4. Innovation & Invention

Such universities do not (over) lecture at students or use rote, standardised assessment that does not change year-after-year. These universities have ‘maker-spaces,’ equipment, tools and a spirit of creativity, as well as high tolerance for trial, error and success. Academics and students partner to ‘give it a go’ researching, inquiring and experimenting.

Some universities are knowledge-hubs. Not only are they effectively preparing students for industries with existing technologies, but they are encouraging and fostering innovation, including supporting students to come up with new solutions, thus creating digital futures.

5. Visualisation

Textbooks, photographs and illustrations do not compare with 3D printing, virtual reality and simulations. Emerging architects can now construct miniature models and make modifications. Medical students can take a virtual trip through the circulatory system. Space programs are advanced by students simulating flight with no real safety risks.

6. Authoring, Profiling & Contribution

Digital technology enables a myriad of ways for students to contribute to the knowledge marketplace. They can build and launch websites, blog, post, comment and curate. Forward-thinking universities create contexts where the term of the degree is equivalent to time in industry. Throughout their studies, learners make real contributions, shape professional reputations and build networks. Their CVs are robust and abundant upon graduation. They have LinkedIn profiles and searchable personal videos showcasing their unique value-propositions.

7. Expert Connections

Some universities have maximised what it means to students to have access to the World Wide Web. This means that students have access to additional experts besides the ones that their own university has hired as academics. Students have access to new discoveries from innovators shortly after they are launched. Students become global citizens as they are connected with students from across the globe for online discussions and debates. Students can go for virtual tours and engage in international work experience without leaving home.

I believe that a university that meets all seven of these visionary characteristics and all seven of these technology enablers might currently exist, but I have yet to have seen or heard of it. While there are lots of universities, including across Australia, who live up to some of these descriptors, they tend to be inhibited by some of another set of seven – this time technology-related problems and challenges that they have not yet overcome.

1. Stagnant Assessment

For many years, academics have been talking about adaptive assessment. This assessment would identify and accommodate students’ current achievement, aptitude and competency levels and adapt accordingly. This would truly personalise learning in that students would be given challenges that they are uniquely ready for. Their learning would be personalised and incremental. This has not successfully transpired in a robust enough manner to take this beyond trial and small specialised application. Instead, whole classes are given the same assessment and some students are bored while others are overwhelmed.

2. Academic Controlled LMS

Learning Management Systems (LMSs) have been incrementally improved over the last decade so that they now include media-rich content and compelling communication and interaction tools. They serve as a one-stop-shop for students to find out what they need to do as assessment, and then submit and track their grades. However, the unanswered plea from students is that they also have access to authoring, beyond the minimal opportunities doled-out by some academics. Students would like to use the LMS as a true one-stop-shop, where students can enter their notes right onto the lecture slides, adding  bookmarks to videos and discussing answers (where appropriate) with other students.

3. Graduation Cut-Off

The next problem is directly related to the previous, in relation to the LMS. Students from most universities are cut-off from electronic university resources upon graduation and many students only have access to the LMS course-site in the semester of enrolment. If universities are truly committed to university-industry connection and lifelong learning, then students and graduates should have indefinite access to course-sites to use as resources for work-integrated application. Furthermore, they should have compelling opportunities to continue to interact with university academics and student/graduate peers.

4. Course-based LMS

Another problem with the current administration of the LMS is that it is administered on a course-by-course basis. Studies then become a collection of courses as opposed to an entire sequenced program (where appropriate). Students have difficulty relating and connecting the developed knowledge, skills and attributes, as well as the relevance of the assessment tasks between courses.

5. Clunky Systems

Booking a flight and selecting hotel deals is now easy through web-sites and mobile apps. Student systems have not reached this level of ease and efficiency. As a result, student time and attention has to be paid to administrative matters that should not be unnecessarily drawing time away from studies and overall student life.

6. Fixed University Systems and Bureaucracy

Visions of innovation are usually cut short by questions such as: what about timetabling, room allocation and work allocation models. Innovations seldom fit within established semesters and grading systems. Academics and Professionals working within universities have fixed roles and sometimes applied territorialism. In this context and culture, enabling applications of education technology cannot be used to maximal advantage.

7. Patchiness

The final frequent problem is that innovation, using education technology, is usually patchy across universities. Some faculties and schools are innovating within specific degrees. Others are not. This makes it particularly challenging, and disappointing, for students who have chosen double-majors or double-degrees. The positive news is that progressive application of education technology raises students’ expectations, who then make demands in areas perceived as under-performing.

This article started with description of education technology innovation, using the Oculus Rift for application of virtual reality. Coming full circle, the key recommendation is that universities apply these seven learning and teaching propositions, successes and problems to modelling progressive virtual universities. Such experimentation in the virtual field can provide concrete guidance for application in real-life universities of the future.

The following two tabs change content below.
Shelley Kinash

Shelley Kinash

Director, Office of Learning & Teaching at Bond University
Dr Shelley Kinash is Director, Office of Learning and Teaching at Bond University. Prior to Bond, Shelley taught as a Visiting Academic to the Faculty of Education (Graduate Certificate in Higher Education and Early Childhood) at University of Southern Queensland. Shelley was an Academic in the Faculty of Education (Educational Technology and Community Rehabilitation and Disability Studies) at the University of Calgary for 12 years. Shelley earned her PhD in Educational Technology in 2004. Her dissertation topic was Blind Online Learners, which she authored as one of her three books published by Information Age - Seeing Beyond Blindness. Shelley remains research active. You can contact her on

There is 1 comment

Add yours

Post a new comment